Awaiting reviewer assignment after under review sample. Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task.

Awaiting reviewer assignment after under review sample I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The entire peer review process usually takes between 2 and 6 months. Toolbox . The system will continue to show "Awaiting reviewer scores" until all reviewers have submitted their reports. Under Review. However, I just noticed that the status of my Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. A current editorial assistant. Then, there was a call for reviewers, and the status changed to ‘Reviewers Invited. For example, if three reviewers are used for an article then it may happen that one reviewer submitted the review for the assigned article to the editor prior to the others. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. This may, however, vary across journals. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. And, if they feel it lacks novelty or is not appropriate to be published in the journal, they give their decision against it. Once the adequate number of reviewers have accepted the invitation, the status should change to “under review. Awaiting Editor Decision. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. I thought this meant the external review. While this typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review, because the status changed so quickly after submission, this probably refers to the internal review, which is about aspects such as a match with the I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! Public Group Active 2 years, 10 months ago . My paper underwent a revision. Research Trend. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly understood, that the actual review begins. CLICK HERE >>> Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review, awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision Awaiting reviewer scores vs under review Expanding exponent calculator, radical expression (no decimals), homework worksheets for 5th grade patterns and functions, awaiting reviewer scores vs under review. ” However, reviewer selection happens much faster in case of revised It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. g. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. 09 under review 12. If there was going to be a rejection, after the reviewers grading, your article would have been rejected. Why does the status change back to "Reviewers assigned" after 3 days of "Under review"? A practical handbook of templates for communicating with the journal; All the best for the next 12. Ranking . 21 accepted Translation: 8. ’ But this could be because the After the ADM had been assigned, I remember seeing "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer selection". Unfortunately, some reviewers might reject to review the paper for various reasons. Awaiting Editor Assignment: While this typically means that the manuscript is awaiting assignment to an AE, in this case, it probably means it is awaiting assignment to a peer reviewer. 13 AE Recommendation 3. But today suddenly the status changed back to The status changed from ‘Awaiting Editorial Office Processing’ to ‘Under Review’ about two months after submission. ' Now, after three weeks, the status date of the manuscript has changed, but the status remains 'Reviewers Assigned. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. you'll find people whose papers have been under review for more than a year. A date for receipt of manuscript proofs UgkR4R‡ ÀÕ=$¢²×ÃN °9iõ¨Z$d^°úãן þûO Á¸û ´lÇåöx}~_¾ÍúïäçËÑ« {ñ¹ Œg^BÈÍ È1¤R²Ý6 Yr$ ›0üo~³ÿ “ÑŽéÆU »J’ý I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a Most likely the assigned reviewer agreed to review but then didn't provide a review, declined to review, or provided a review that made the editor think another review is required. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. And then the status automatically changed to "under review". So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. This refers to the has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). From your query, it seems reviewers have been assigned for your manuscript. This change has occurred With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would instead mean the previous stage, where it is being considered by the handling editor(s) and might still be rejected without review. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Typically, the AE invites the same set of reviewers, although there is the option to add new reviewers (if additional input is needed), or drop some (for example, if they were entirely satisfied with the previous version). On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. ' Often people decline invitations to review papers. their own expertise, or assign reviewers. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. After half a day, the status changed to ‘Under Review. Awaiting EIC decision must have appeared after the first status while you did not check your status! It Appearing after short interval of awaiting reviewer assignment clearly means that associate editors have advised against it! Now the EIC has to make decision. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. It is against TMI policy to reveal the status of a paper under review. Meanwhile, the editorial management system will be configured to automatically What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online submission system? changed from "under review" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? then changed I think @ShakeBaby might have nailed it in the "whatever" comment. But today suddenly the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ again. Ditolak 2. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Hi. One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. 11 awaiting reviewer assignment 12. Instead of the normal process streamline in the Editorial Manager that usually goes through "with editor-reviewer invited-under review-reject/accept", mine has gone into "awaiting reviewer assignment-reviewer assigned" and haven't heard from them for a month. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. ’ Aug 8, 2014 Jul 15, 2019 · Thus the follow-on status “under review” means that the manuscript has been sent get with review. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. It is an inadequate explanation for why your These are relatively simple. Then after a week or so, it changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Score(s)" and same Under review --> some journals seem to use this for every stage of peer review. What can this mean? The platform is My paper was under review for two days and now is ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’. You have three queries. You must have received positive reviews. In this case, you will notice that the duration of Under Review is relatively short for 1-2 weeks. Been The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. Decision notification e-mails and what they mean. Peer review times vary per Some examples include “editor assigned,” “reviewers invited,” “under review,” “review complete,” “decision pending,” and others. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again So he is looking for another reviewer (or doing the review himself), as suggested by @Buzz; the 2nd round raised more than minor concerns. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". ""Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. then the EIC would be the one to evaluate the manuscript. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Also, related to one of Marcus' points above, if we have recieved two reviews, the system updates to 'Reviews I submitted a paper to a journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. Immediately after submission, one ADM was assigned, but MAL ADM (an abbreviation that is not known to me) was not assigned, and the status was I submitted a manuscript to a medical science journal. After almost three weeks of "Awaiting reviewer assignment" status, it changes to "Reviewers contacted". During the peer-review process, submitted articles are assessed by a panel of experts, known as reviewers, who evaluate the competence, importance and 6. While the Editor is assigned to a manuscript, authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. However, today, I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again [email protected] Submitted my paper. However, this change should not be cause for The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. This change has occurred I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. But sometimes the reviewers do not return to the Editor within the time After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again . Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. Usually, an article being assigened to an editor after review is a good thing. the other one move from AE assignment to reviewer selection pretty fast, like in 5 days. Then, it was updated to ‘Reviewers Assigned’ in about two weeks. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". This status will remain until an Editor takes an action in the system to change the status, usually inviting reviewers. Please note that other statuses may The reviewers usually take 1-2 months to review a submission, but some papers may take longer, e. So, keep What do reviewers look for? This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and accompanying teaching note. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted a paper to an internationally reputed journal. After the review scores come back, a manuscript then After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". The status of the paper changed several times. I have submitted a paper to a very reputed publication of electrical engineering via ScholarOne. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? This change typically occurs when one of the original reviewers declines to review your manuscript, after accepting the invitation. However, the status changed to ‘Assigning for review’ for about a week and then changed to ‘Under review’ again, this time for about a week. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. As stated by Rodriguez, Bollen, and Van de Sompel (2007): “one of the first and potentially most important stage is the one that attempts to distribute submitted Each section below is an overview complete with screen shots of the manuscript review process. The manuscript status has changed from "awaiting reviewer scores" back to "under review". Usually, it is not a single reviewer, but several reviewers. 6 years ago # QUOTE 2 YEA 3 NAY! I feel you OP. What does this mean? Will it go for review? Thank you for your question. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. ' Gain insights into why reviewer changes occur and decode updates throughout the submission After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. In ScholarOne this would be like having it set to require 2 reviews, then when the 2 reviews come in, I have had a piece under review for over 2 months, and the online status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment," even though authors are encouraged to suggest the potential reviewers (which I did). Status as "Under Edit: got the email, they’ve sent invitations out to reviewers! Thanks for the nice responses and I’ll leave the post up for anxious status update checkers in the future :) Share Add a Comment. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. For example, the editor or the editor's I am afraid it does not forebode reassurance when a paper such as yours, after being duly revised and resubmitted, changes its status from 'under review' to 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. Your article has now received the minimum number of reviews required to make a decision. Now, it has changed to ‘Assigning for · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Article is undergoing the peer review, and one or both of the evaluators has accepted the invitation and/or at least one evaluation has Sometimes, a reviewer may pull out after being assigned, for reasons of a lack of time, mismatch (with their subject area), or conflict of interest. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did The editors are reading it and checking their reviewer list. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. The status was ‘Assigning to editors’ for three days and then ‘Under review’ for a month. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. I think awaiting reviewers' scores after revision means that your response to the queries raise is under Sep 7, 2021 · In your case, it is possible that the revised manuscript was taken up by an editor/associate [email protected] Submitted my paper. Initially the status was "awaiting admin checklist", and then changed to "under My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. 30 awaiting reviewer assignment 2. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. I submitted a paper on April 8. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 3. What does this status mean? Thank you for your advice. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". What does this indicate? I submitted a research paper to a journal. • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Let’s take them one by one. Any thoughts? Once the requisite number of reviewers accept the invitation, the status will change to "under review. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: ‘minor revisions’, ‘major revisions’, ‘revise and resubmit’ and ‘reject’ decisions. 12 Awaiting AE Recommendation 1. The first update, ADM: [a person’s name], means that the manuscript was first in administrative (shortened to ‘ADM’) processing, which is the typical first stage after submission. If it has been "under review" for some time, then yes - the external reviewers are done. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. After one week with the editor, the status has changed to Under Review. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. "Reviewers assigned" is where I have accepted to review a manuscript but not yet opened it and "Under review" is only after I have downloaded it. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. The journal says on well I'm not sure. It means that the AE has performed their initial check (as described in the previous point) and is looking for suitable peer reviewers. For example, the poster who said he/she has had a paper waiting for editor's After the review process, editor is assigned to check the quality of the paper and the reviewers comments. As can be inferred from Fig. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? In another example, I would complain if my paper is still not under review after one month, but it’s fine if it is under review at that time. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. So the editor may add another reviewer, to settle the case. What does this mean? If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. 1 Accept. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo I submitted my manuscript to a journal. The questions editors ask reviewers I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". If two reviews come and they both recommend to reject the paper, and the AE agrees, with the reviews, then the AE may decide to reject the paper Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. In case ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ happened earlier, they initially decided to send it for review, but changed their mind, and decided to On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? the manuscript will be forwarded to the reviewers. ) Awaiting reviewer assignment under review CN Integrity Webinar March 31 SA Shelby See, this is just unhelpful. But only after two days under review the status changed to “Awaiting AE Recommendation”. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Conference Ranking. 5. Due to the situation necessitated by COVID-19, journal workflows and decision-making may have been impacted to some extent. I assume Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which is the equivalent of "Under review. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory; The system only updated to 'Under Review' when two reviewers have BOTH accepted to review the paper. " However, in your case, the status changed back Explore the transition in manuscript status from 'Under Review' to 'Reviewers Assigned. Manuscript Generator. Now for the last We define reviewing the timeline in author guidelines (e. I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal using the ScholarOne system. Also in most cases, the AE will receive an e-mail to notify him that the minimum number of reviews has been received and he must submit a decision within a couple of days / week. Best guess: reviews came in after all this time but were inconclusive, and "editor assigned" is the default state when needing to get more reviews and no reviewer has actually been assigned. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. Country Ranking EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. 23 minor revision 1. The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. Is this normal?I received an acceptance pending minor revisions. Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. I didnt see the "under review That could be because the system requires four reviewers, but the editor has only gotten the commitment from three people to review the paper. At the same time, journals may opt to display fewer statuses. After one week, the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned,' and it remained so for one day. Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor’s decision. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? publications; peer-review; journal-workflow; There are a number of possibilities. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural The status changed to admin check to under review after one week. t backed up) I have recently resubmitted a piece of 2nd R&R "provisional acceptance, review required". AE stands for "Associate Editor. Sometimes, after the first round, a reviewer notices sometimes more important, and can ask for a major revision (or a reject). 14 awaiting reviewer scores 1. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. This is an open access article under the CC BY license Wang, Zhou, & Shi, 2013), Committee Review Assignment (CRA A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. Sort by: The under review date changed after 25 days You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. 29 awaiting I have experienced a confusing situation. Journal Matcher. Diterima dengan Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. If you didn't see "under review", then the I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 1. How long have you been awaiting reviewer assignment? Awaiting reviewer selection == editorial assistants need to do their jobs. However, there has been no status change for more than two-and-a-half months. 2, the assignment result of reviewers to papers determines the expertise of the reviewer who will review the paper, hence it is the crucial step in the whole peer review process. There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society's journals: Reject wit I submitted my manuscript to Management Science. I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. Perhaps it took the journal two months to (1) Some journals carry an internal review firstly before sending the manuscript for external review. The EiC at that time said they'll look Peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the manuscript and therefore takes time. The status is shown as “awaiting reviewer selection” apparently because the editor is still waiting for reviewers to accept the invitation to review. 10 weeks) however, when we invite the reviewer we gave them 1 week to accept reviewing task and 4 weeks to submit reviewing reports. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. In such instances, the editor seeks an alternative reviewer to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". After a couple of days, the status changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review". The amount of time a manuscript is in review depends on reviewer availability. After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". – Wrzlprmft ♦ Commented Jul 8, 2015 at 6:41 Hi. Even a single reviewer didn’t accept the assignment, it starts showing overdue just after one week, although few reviewers accepted and under review. 5 awaiting reviewer scores 3. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". If an editor wants, say, two reviews for a paper, they may initially invite four or five referees. Reviewers have been invited and the peer review process is underway. The manuscript status was updated to ‘Under Review’ in a month after submission. This has happened several times. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. ' However, after 15 days, it again changed to 'Reviewers Assigned. ’ So far, so good. This change has occurred After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. After that, it changed to 'Under Review. , when they are especially complex or are received during the review period of major conferences. For instance, if ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ happened earlier, it may mean the AE first decided to refer their decision to the EIC, but changed their mind, and then decided to send it for review. Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. Does it mean that is under the review of editorial office? Could it change from Awaiting AE assignment to Under Review directly without AE being assigned ? What does awaiting reviewer assignment mean under review? Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. This change has Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. After the revision, the paper is sent back to the reviewers for checking the corrections and making their final decisions. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the invitation (because they have a conflict of I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). I was wondering about the A week later, the status changed to Awaiting Editor Assignment. @scaaahu My only guess is that the Editor invited some reviewers, not all of which accepted. The status was updated to "Under Review" in 20 days from the submission, and again updated to "Pending Approval" after 1 month from then. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. The reviewing process starts when editors send the paper to the first suitable reviewer, and ends when final review is complete. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Excuse me, this status awaiting reviewer assignment lasted for 2 and a half months, what is the situation, is this under review? - IEEE Transactions on Magnetics Forum Forum. Now, it shows Awaiting Decision. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. Assigning Reviewers Awaiting Reviewer Assignment To assign a Reviewer to a manuscript, click on the Awaiting Reviewer Assignment link on the Home Page, and To mitigate these challenges, solutions for automated association of papers with "well matching" reviewers - the task often referred to as reviewer assignment problem (RAP) - have been the subject The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. Mar 16, 2022 · Answer: Dear Author, Thank you for your question. I I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. After making the necessary changes, I submitted the manuscript. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. The status of my paper changed from "Awaiting AE assignment" to "Under Review" directly. " Does it mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? I was told that for paper with "minor revision," it is likely like it will not be sent back to the reviewers. -The ms status updates aren't as informative as people think. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. Meaning of ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment’ This means that your manuscript has cleared the admin check, that is, it was found matching the journal’s scope and also adhering to the journal’s guidelines, apart from a cursory check of the novelty and quality of the study. 27 submit & under review 1. This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". It passed the initial evaluation 10 days later. (Which the editor may deem enough, and so the status will never change until the three reviews have been received. IEEE Policy on Reviewers Using AI: Information or content contained in or about a manuscript under review shall not be processed through a public platform (directly or indirectly) for AI generation of text for a review. While Editorial Manager provides editors with the tools to display granular status to authors, it is ultimately up to the journal’s As a reviewer, you are obligated to maintain the confidentiality of both the paper you are reviewing and also of your review. 15 days I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). Q: How can I decide whether my suspicion is correct? What handling times The system in most Transactions lets you change the minimum number of reviews so that the status is "Under Review" rather than "with Associate Editor". However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. These both relate to having a current cv uploaded online on your department's or your personal website. ’ However, 14 days later, it changed to ‘Reviewers Invited. But today suddenly the status changed back to Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred A reviewer assignment example of maximizing topic coverage of papers. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did It sounded like their "under review" meant basically "Under Editor's Review". I submitted a research manuscript to Hindawi Publisher. What does this change mean? Does it mean that one of the selected reviewers has declined the invitation? Is it a bad sign? Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is For revisions, the process starts over again – selecting reviewers, obtaining reviews, and making a recommendation. skrttzq gggofkc kjb perkv bpjt cbd zru iou pxwk amiv