It has excellent power even for pushing the AAA games on maxed-out graphics settings at 1440p. If you want high-end performance for 1440p gaming without the cost of a high-end card, this is an excellent choice. I play a lot of different games with a 5600x and 3060 Ti setup @ 1440p medium-high settings and get around 120 frames average. It all depends on you. Dec 16, 2020 · Gaming at 2560 x 1440. A 1660 super or Ti would be the cheapest cards to reliably get 100+fps in 1080p, a 1650 super (not regular) could work but you'll probably get 60-80fps unless you play on absolute minimum settings. And only ~25% slower than the 3080. I sold my 3080 Ti a few days afterwards; beastly card but the 4070 Super/Ti Super is better. We also ran the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC Black Gaming through our suite at 2560 x 1440. A GTX 1060 6GB or RX 580 8GB would be an ideal choice in this situation. -In the USA anyway, the 4070 is considerably cheaper than a 3080ti (even a used one,) only pulls 200w TDP vs 350w; it's also 2 years newer and has some nice features like DLSS 3. Normal use, should be perfectly fine for 1080p high and 1440p medium-high. What would be your recommendation? P. I’m currently running a MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Super Gaming X with dual 1440p curved monitors. GTA V is ancient, it'll be fine, Metro on low is on the edge maybe, but more like 50+? Guys I am planed to buy a 1660ti for play in 1440p, only play fps most of the time like bf4, bf1, etc, csgo, the monitor is the acer Predator 27" 1440p ips 144hz gsync, MT setup is: So yeah I've just ordered myself the BenQ Mobiuz EX2780Q 1440p 144Hz Monitor because It was a pretty incredible deal. That is a good 1440p experience. I have glasses, not too strong, though. Where it really shines is the heat output, power draw, and the fan noisewhat a change. So this is kinda a question, discussion, GPU comparison, recommendation combo situation. 1440p is pretty nice. Jun 9, 2024 · The GTX 1660 Super remains a favorite among gamers for its great value, delivering solid 1080p and even 1440p gaming performance. unless you can get exactly 150fps+ on average than the gpu is not good enough for 144hz. Jun 21, 2022 · Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti. 8 fps at 1440p, and 44. Planning on building a computer but need some advice? This is the place to ask! /r/buildapc is a community-driven subreddit dedicated to custom PC assembly. I have a RX 5700XT and have two monitors- a 32 inch 1440p 60 Hz and a 24 inch 1080p 165 Hz. Right now, I'm just ruffling with the prices. I wanted to ask if it's enough for the resolution. Back before the shortages started, in 2019, the GTX 1660 Super was the smart choice because it was only a little bit more expensive than the GTX 1660, but nearly as fast as the GTX 1660 ti. Im using a 720p monitor but later Im planning on upgrading that as well. Wondering if it will be okay on 1440p low settings and I assume 1080p with be good in medium for most games? The laptop is $350 I mostly play Fortnite, Rocket League, and Diablo 4 Is this an okay deal? Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Gaming Laptop. I have a 3080ti and a 32” odyssey g7 1440p 240hz monitor. Didn’t realize that my frame rate would be so effected by the size of my monitor. I prefer monitor which is 24 inch (small room, sitting in front of monitor) but not sure if I can find one with 1440p 1ms 144hz HDR and ips. For slower paced games I use the 1440p So, I know that Nvidia just showcased their new cards, however $500 isn't really in my budget for a new GPU. Reply reply Sorry for the straightforward title/question, but I’m trying to figure out the best mid-tier card to purchase for gaming on a 1440p 60-70hz monitor. If you consider 8GB of VRAM as future proof where some games already are on the edge of that on 1440p, okay. 21:9 1440p monitor. For the next years, I believe that 8gb will be the sweet spot for 1080p and 1440p GPUs. g. My current build: i7-9700K | GTX 1660 Ti | 16GB (2x8GB) RAM | ADATA 240GB SSD | 1000GB HDD and I use 3 monitors (1x 1440p and 2x 1080p) I'm currently looking to upgrade my graphics card but I'm not sure what to get. 0 seems promising too. The 4070 Tis between a 3090 and a 3090 Ti in most games at rasterization, and better than a 3090 Ti for RT. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Upgrading 1660 super for 1440p gaming Build Upgrade Hello (gtx 1660 super) to play games in 1440p TBH, I'm surprised to hear a 1660 Ti struggles to maintain "good FPS". GTX 1080 Ti: ~144fps locked The min. Until recently I was planning on upgrading to new setup, which is: Rtx 3070 +1440p@144Hz monitor + Ryzen 5600x. My 1060 3gb isn't really cutting it with… What CPU and GPU combo do you think would be a great fit for 1440p gaming? Is it worth getting a whole new pc build or can I upgrde a parts? I appreciate any advice or insights you can share regarding potential bottlenecks, compatibility concerns, or other considerations I might be overlooking. You get a lot more bang for your buck when going with the AMD cards, but you miss out on DLSS and Ray Tracing. So maybe have to pick either 1080p 24inch vs 1440p 27inch. 75Hz would be fine for the single player games listed as a 1660 Super wouldn't get much above that at high settings in those games. 1660ti ($279) averages 99. Little known fact about the 1660, is it can actually do Ray Tracing in some titles. But I have 2 32" 1440p 144Hz monitors and I think a 27" might be too small for 1440p. 27" 1440p (16:9) seems to be sweet spot for this size. i have an rtx 2060 and still cant get 144fps in some games i play which are rust (avg 80fps) and gta online (avg 70fps in city, 90fps in country). Gtx 1660 ti vs gtx 1080 I currently have a GTX 1660 Super, which I bought as a placeholder GPU until I could find a better one in stock. The 4060 ti is roughly 10% faster at 1080p than the 3060 ti but only 4% at 1440p as it's memory bandwidth is very low in a few instances it's performance is equal to the 4060 but yeah if AMD doesn't exist at a good price you don't have a choice, enjoy the cool room and Gtx 1660 Ti 8GB Ram Corsair Vengeance (x2) 3000Mhz MSI B450 Pro Carbon ac PSU EVGA 700 BQ CPU Cooler Hyper H410R 1TB m2 SSD Nvme 256 GB SSD Kingston 1 TB HDD Blue(x2) Monitor. Found out later that same day that my gtx 1660 ti isn't quite optimal for that resolution. It's not like it can't handle it, but I notice a slight difference in gaming performance compared to my previous monitor. 😂 Even at 32" sometimes I have to squint close to the screen, but that might be for unoptimized games that don't have options to scale text or interface. Depends on your budget but I don’t think it’s worth it. It can technically do RTX on some titles, but don't try unless you want a slide show. I have a 1660S anda 1440p monitor and I enjoy it. But it doesn’t hurt to save more for a 3070 if you find one for MSRP. At 1080p AMD comes closer but the problem is that they aren't cheaper (or easier to come by) while being just on par in terms on performance but without RTX and DLSS. Budget is 5-15k. (A reference model would be 5-10 percent slower I've been thinking of getting the 1660 SUPER online for Valorant, CS:GO at 144-170 FPS while single player games like Hitman and Assassin's Creed on 60 FPS will be fine. Dec 16, 2020 · We also ran the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC Black Gaming through our suite at 2560 x 1440. rn intel i5 10, 11 or 12th gen are all good! best price/performance right now for your gpu would be i5 10400f! usually it can be found well under 150€ and yea, great choice to pair with that! also i3 12th gen is great price/performance but i cant say for motherboards if prices are ok! somewhere prices on b660 mobos or 610 are good, somehwere sucks! So looking at the prices, the 3050 (Zotac RTX 3050 Twin Edge) is a little bit cheaper in my region than the 1660 TI (Gigabyte GTX 1660 Ti OC), which I initially found odd, but comparing the two cards on the internet, it shows that the GTX 1660 TI gets slightly more fps than the RTX 3050. Those two parts together will be monstrous in 1440p gaming. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now 1660 ti for 1080p 144hz gaming? mistakenly read 1440p instead of 144Hz 1080p. 2060s or a 5700 can get you decent framerates at Med to High or even Ultra settings, but nothing in the high refresh range for modern games. Jesus Christ ignore these other comments, the 3060 ti is an awesome 1440p card and whatever it can’t max it it can play at medium settings and 1080 is just a blurry mess , get yourself a nice 1440/165z monitor and eventually when you want to upgrade the GPU you can take advantage of the monitor fully. Happy holidays all. Running at 4k resolution and turning that slider down to 50% will effectively run your game at 1080p, but without the distortion or odd-looking pixels that forcing a non-native resolution on your display can result in. I bought 1660 ti 2 years ago and I play games on 1080p 60Hz monitor. You wont get 140fps probably with your laptop in 4k. I would go with the 1080p, and upgrade your rig for 1440p later down the road. From what I’ve read both of these would work, but looking for any personal opinions. If your aim is 1440p-4k, multi monitor, and VR, all maxed out settings and still getting 90-120 FPS, you probably would do for an upgrade. Even new AAA games run well on high-ultra graphics and it can also do ray tracing. I’m running a 1660 GPU, 4770k CPU and 8GB of DDR3 1660MHz I’d say go for for 1660 Ti or 1660 Super if you can - I love my 1660 but worry I might have to upgrade soon with all these next-gen graphics jumps coming My system performance for reference @ 1440p Overwatch: 120-130 FPS medium settings CoD Black-ops: 55-65 FPS medium settings Try using a gtx 1660 ti on anything that isnt rocket league, r6, or league. 6 inch display @ 120hz. Welcome to the official subreddit of the PC Master Race / PCMR! All PC-related content is welcome… GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Benchmarks and performance test in 22 Games at 1440p in 2022Timestamps ⏱ Batman Arkham Knight : 00:00 God of War : 00:56 Godfall : 02: And, more specifically, you'll get a little worse than 1440p but much better than 4K, because 4K is ~2x the pixels of 1440p, but 3440x1440 is only ~1. It's confusingly similar to Nvidia's existing GTX 1060, implying it's some sort of weird, halfway house between that and the GTX 1070, when in fact it's actually part of Nvidia's new Turing family, which is the same GPU inside their new RTX 20-series cards, making it, in effect, much more closely related to the The 115W 2060 is 13% faster than the 1660 ti (Hardware unboxed) at 1080p, and like any faster gpu differences become wider at higher resolutions. DLSS is amazing at 1440p and FSR 2. The gap between 1440p and 4k is huge, that's where things are going mad. For 1440p gaming, 3080ti will hold you off for some time. . I think that 1660ti is a good 1080p gpu for gaming. My question to you is I have been racing 3-4 months and am already considering VR or triples. r/buildapc A chip A close button. According to reviews that I have read it bounces around between 3080 Ti and 3090 Ti, depends on game and whether RT is enabled. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. I have a GTX 1660 ti gaming laptop and I'm thinking of saving up for a 27" external monitor. Yeah, its not a 2070 or 2080, but on the same token its not like 4k is that big of a deal nowadays graphics wise. It's overkill. Of course, you can still use DLSS at 1080p by faking 1440p with DLDSR, which is even more crazy, but the thing is that it still isn’t true 1440p, so it’ll run with exactly the same performance as native 1440p, but will look worse. i have a 3090ti (watercooled) paired with a 5900x, currently gaming on 1440p-166mhz (non wide) f1 2022 everything maxed out avg 100fps a plage tale maxed out it barely gets to 80 some parts of the game would go down to 50fps That's quite the question, not been playing these AAA games lately. But you seem to be confused over what you're buying. Most games yes, but some of the latest and most demanding games might not run at high settings. Welcome to r/gaminglaptops, the hub for gaming laptop enthusiasts. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now 27GN850-B 1440p 144hz monitor and now I am planning to buy a gaming laptop with GTX 1660 Ti, RTX 2060 The GTX 1660 Ti is very close to the GTX 1070 in performance, but on an updated architecture and at a lower price. Honestly the 3070 in a few years is gonna be a 1080pUltra/1440p medium-high card, I'd get the 3080 if you want good frames at 1440p+ Ultra settings, I just built a 5600x/3070 rig paired with a 1080p 165hz monitor and recent heavy hitters like RDR2, Control with RTX, MSFS2020, all get 50-100+fps depending on the scenario (MSFS about 40-70fps) which is great considering everything is maxed out 10M subscribers in the pcmasterrace community. Regular 1440p: 3,686,400 pixels 1440p UW: 4,953,600 pixels Regular 4K: 8,294,400 pixels IMO 1440p Ultrawide really isn't too much harder to run compared to regular 1440p with something like a 6700 XT or a 3070. I have RTX 3070 + DLSS, i am able to come close to my 165hz 1440p refresh rate. The price/performance it brings to the table scales linearly with the RX 570 and RX 580. You really don't want to be much below 60, which would be your monitors refresh rate, I assume. Removing all of that from the equation: the 2070, at the low end, is 25% faster than the 1660 Ti and can be up to 40% faster depending on the title. Get app But first before taking any final decision, I would like to know if the 1660 Ti would be good enough to get either 60 or 75 fps at 1440p resolution with some high details on some games (Mainly thinking on Doom Eternal). 3070/Ti with 8Gb is very limiting, a lot of new games @1440p already need more than 8Gb of VRAM on ultra textures. If you guys were going to buy a new gaming/multi purpose laptop; Would it be the gtx 1660 ti (6g), rtx 3050 ti (4g), or perhaps wait a little bit longer and pick up a rtx 3060? Welcome to r/gaminglaptops, the hub for gaming laptop enthusiasts. Check out the GPU Hierarchy list, the 1440p ultra settings graph shows that the RX 6700 non-XT is a solid contender as well. The 3060 Ti the go-to bang-for-the-buck 1440p gaming graphics card. but you can get a 1440p monitor (not ultrawide but say a 27 inch monitor) and run 140fps in dota. I mostly play shooters and racing games like Forza and CS:GO. If you are playing AAA titles like Assassins Creed or Tomb Raider, you will not be hitting 100+ FPS on 1080p 144hz, and you will struggle to reach 60FPS on 1440p in graphically intensive titles. That would easily be the best option out of what you listed, since it's faster than a 3060Ti to boot in raster, and RT isn't super relevant if it hasn't got enough vram for modern titles or raw performance to begin with. I'm planning to upgrade from GTX 1660 Ti to 3060 Ti/3070 later this year. Are you saying that the 3070 is also only for undemanding 1440p and mainly for 1080p? In the 18 game average of HUB's review the 3060 Ti managed on average 114fps at 1440p high quality. If you plan on keeping a 1080p monitor for 5 years, the smartest thing to do will be to buy a 1660 Ti for today, save your extra $100 (literally save it - or invest, w/e, set it aside), and then in 3-4 years if the 1660 Ti feels slow, take that $100 out and put it towards another new ~$250-350 graphics card. There's a notable difference between 1440p and 4K at 17" in my experience, but I agree 4K is probably slightly overkill at that size and not worth it unless you've got money to burn. You're problem is that: The motherboard you have supports only PCI3, which means the current generation of GPUs will likely get bottlenecked on the PCIE bus. So the end result may very well be that at 1440p it both looks better and runs faster, which is kind of crazy. I haven't tried many heavy games at 1440p (except for starfield but with FSR so it doesn't count) The games i did try like valorant and fall guys run without any issues at 100+ fps at 1440p. The RTX 3060 Ti is good for +60FPS 1440p gaming. I ran several games (including Battlefield 1) on a TV @ 4K/60 with a 1070 when it came out, and those two cards are practically identical in performance. 1080p on a 1440p monitor looks like crap Desktop 1660 Ti (which is faster than yours) can't handle many AAA games at stable 60 FPS at 1440p. By comparison, the 1060 launched almost exactly 3 years after the 760 (also at $250), and was basically double the performance with 3x the VRAM. Build Help I need a video card for my second PC. I want a better screen but not sure if my card can handle For more recent AAA titles. It's a 4050 TI that Nvida decided to rename to 4060 TI to up-charge 100 dollars on it. I have used i5-3570K since it came out and had no problems with it running in pair 1st with GTX680 then GTX780 and currently GTX1080 (I buy gfx cards just after release) all games maxed out on 1080p(144hz)/1440p never under 60fps and many games 144fps until ACOrigins, ACOddysey and Battlefield's 1 and 5 arrived and my i5 overclocked to 4. For games like RD2, i am able to AVG 120fps and the same goes for God of War, or pretty much any AAA game titles with a mixture of HIGH TO ULTRA graphic settings. An asus tuf rx 5600 xt or a msi 1660 ti ventus . The i5-9400 can't keep up with gpus too much faster than the 1660 ti. I'm thinking about shelling out more cash for a 1440p 144hz monitor but I'm not sure if it's worth it considering I have a 3050TI GPU? Was also considering getting a 1080p monitor for the same reason but I keep reading bad reviews about the BenQ Mobiuz EX2510S which seemed like a good option at first. 1% FPS in FFXIV can get pretty bad if your GPU is underspecced, so I wouldn't recommend anything lower than the 1660 Ti (which is roughly equivalent to a 1070) if you care about frame drops. The GTX 1660 Ti is a terrible, terrible name. 3080ti just does it evga gtx 1660 ti xc 750w PSU He is currently using some old 40" 1080p 60hz TV as his main monitor and honestly it doesn't look good compared to the HDR display I have and the HDR display his brother has (his brother owns a G32QC-A, that's why I started looking at it, figured it would be nice to give him something similar). But waiting for the 7700 XT would be pretty reasonable I think. 8 FPS at 1080p, 68. That said if you can afford the bit extra 144Hz will certainly give a smoother experience in Val/CS and other less demanding games, and likely have a better response times than a 75Hz depending on which monitor you choose (IPS panel would be ideal). If it couldn't do 1440p no one would have a reason to upgrade from the 1080 ti. Frame rates aren’t quite where I would like them and I am about to add a 3rd 1440p monitor. For esports titles, you can crank the settings to high or ultra. Consider this. Just dropped some cash on a 32 inch curved 2k (1440p) Monitor. Both will run 1440p no problem. 7 fps at 1440p, and 40. When I overclock my GPU I get around 10% more performance. The 1660 Ti (which is identical performance to the 1660 Super and 1070) is fine for 1080p144 and 1440p60, and 1440p144 in easy to run games like Valorant. itll be my first time building a pc My first choice was the rx 5600 xt but i have seen a lot of reviews and comments on the card being unstable,having black screen,green screens and a lot of driver problems. My processor is a 5600g and I have 32 GB of 3200 MHz RAM. I want to run games at higher settings (but am willing to slightly compromise from "ultra" settings) at a steady 144 fps in 1440p. 2070 super ($499) gets you to an average of 58. But the final verdict, ofc, depends on the games you play. I don't really play triple-A titles, but any e-sports title and game release before 2019 generally runs fine at 1440p and looks better than 1080p if you turn settings down. But for 1440p gaming have you ever thought about the Vega 56? I don't know what games specifically you're wanting to play, but at 1440p specifically the Vega 56 outpaces the 1660 ti at about the same price. My question is, will a Ryzen 5 1600x at 3. I'd get the 3060 Ti for the short term and maybe upgrade to a 3070 Ti (if it has its rumored 10GB GDDR6x) later. A place for everything NVIDIA, come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the industry, show-off your… I'm about to pull the trigger on a desperately needed new GPU (I'm running a 1660 Ti currently). If money matters don't even think about pairing a 7900 XT (or XTX) with a 1440p monitor. To me 27" 4K (16:9) isn't worth it for gaming. I have an EVGA GTX 1660 Ti SC Ultra with a 144hz 1080p monitor and I get along fine with high/ultra, but with 1440p I'd have to tweak a few graphical settings to have a good balance. 5 years ago at $250. Bro I played at 1440p on GTX 1660 Ti (same as Super) last year even for games like Starfield For 1080p it's still solid if you can't afford something like RX6600/6600XT/6650XT or RTX 3060 (I upgraded to this, used) The 1660 Ti looks to be about 40% better than a 1060, which launched over 2. 3 fps at 4k. If you will recall, the 3080 Ti, 3090 and even to a degree, the 3090 Ti are all bunched up at the top. S. In my country there isn't really any MSRP options, so the cheapest 3060 costs 600€ (Gigabyte Eagle). That videocard should be fine. In a couple years 1440p or 4K may well be standard and alot cheaper to run. Those I have played in the past include cyberpunk, doom, MSFS (60 frames max in that one, but high frames aren't needed in a flight sim), elite dangerous, a couple recent assassin's creed games, halo MCC (infinite isn't brilliantly optimised, but performance is more than acceptable), outer world's, I could probably go on idk So I recently upgraded my 1080p monitor to 1440p 144hz ultrawide and now I feel like I need a graphics card upgrade. 6750xt is amazing value at 1440p as a solid ~90fps+ high/optimised raster card. The GTX 1070 still impresses with comfortable 1080p gaming, making RTX 2070 Super will be good for 1440p with ultra/mixed settings for each game. Blizzard games and e-sports titles are fine, for example I usually get about 60-90 fps playing wow on medium/high at 1440p. Gtx 1660 ti new or gtx 1080 used which one to get Price is the same View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. I wouldn't switch monitors without upgrading the GPU first. Displaying 4k should be no issue. 6900xt is the best for 1440p/1080p, while 3090/3080Ti will be better at 4k, especially with DLSS, plus you can try RT at 1440p/1080p native or with DLSS. I’m currently running a GTX 1660 Ti with an Intel Core i7-9700F with 16 GBs of ram. Honestly, whether or not a card is “still viable” largely depends on the games you personally like to play. I think that’s the only version of 2060 worth getting, else stick to the 1660 ti Welcome to r/gaminglaptops, the hub for gaming laptop enthusiasts. 4M subscribers in the nvidia community. A GTX 1660 Super is an introductory 1440p GPU but it really just depends on the games you play the most and the frame rates for those games that you're looking to run them at. Jan 26, 2022 · Gigabyte's RTX 3050 Eagle shows us Nvidia's mainstream GPU has GTX 1660 Ti power with RTX sensibilities. Will it run 1440p fine or will I need something more powerful? Jun 8, 2015 · Unfortunately, you’ll not get 144 Hz at 1440p with that GPU. The 3060 Ti is only like 10% slower than the 3070 at 1440p. 1440p is nice, but unfortunately it takes a hell of alot of GPU power and with the outrageous prices/shortage you probably wont be finding a card that can run 1440 anytime soon. So you are left with the $300-$350 cards, the 3060 TI and the 6700XT - 6750XT. I do photo and video editing and play primarily story-based games. A 8 Gb GPU, like 3070 and it's ti version, can decently run 4k, but if you want ultra textures, that's a bottleneck. I plan on getting a 170hz 1440p IPS monitor from GIGABYTE and run the games in medium to high settings in either 1440p or 1080p, I'll also be streaming sometimes. A 1660 absolutely 1070 owner here: I prefer 144hz over 1440p. I run everything at max. My GPU is the 5700XT, so the 3070 Ti would be great. 3440x1440p is ultrawide which is more like 4k. For everyday multimedia and some light games (that support 1440p) you can enjoy 27 inch 1440p (youtube for example). Probably around 50 FPS. A Ti is generally for people trying to pump out the most FPS they can, think consistent 240FPS on CSGO for instance, while not always the case, most of the people I see using Ti’s just want more bang for their buck and could care less about graphics, but if you’re just wanting a good card for 1440p high/ultra settings, get the regular 3060. It will just be Ray tracing performance is likely way better for the 3060ti so nvidia still got that and 1080p DLSS might improve in the future. He would easily see 100+ FPS at 1080p on max settings in most games. In some games, quality settings that worked well at 1920 x 1080 were still viable. It's definitely a side grade, with an appreciable bump in FPS/Ray Tracing performance. 1440p doesn't just describe "one" resolution. I was considering a RTX 3060 TI as well, but the cheapest one is around 800€, so that isn't quite an option for now. I sold my 3070 to get a 7900 XTX, the performance difference is huge! OP, do yourself a favor and save a few hundred $ more on a better GPU, no less than 12Gb. Single 1440p or dual Monitor 1080p, aiming around 60-90FPS, you probably do not need to upgrade. I just went from a 3080 Ti to a 4070 Ti Super. Depending on what resolution we're talking about, hitting 120fps steadily could require a 4090 if you want all settings on max. If you are playing sports games or stuff like LoL/Rocket League/Fortnite, then sure, a 1660 Ti is a good choice for even 1080p 144hz or 1440p 60hz gaming. A 3080 Ti was roughly the performance of a 3090 with half the VRAM. Discover discussions, news, reviews, and advice on finding the perfect gaming laptop. Whatever you do, stick with the 1440p monitor because you can game in 1080p resolution on your 1440p monitor if you want to game in 1080p. The 1650 super is in my budget and Ive seen it do well on 1080p. Your mileage may vary. But it's a bad optimized game, even Cyberpunk doesn't need that much. 1660 Super with curved 32" 1440P 144Hz. No NVIDIA Stock Discussion. But if raytracing is not necessary and we're talking about the 16:9 1440p, then a 3080 would do just fine. GTX 1660 is the slowest of the three. The 1660 ti is a good board. At 80-90% graphics stays above 100FPS fine. Feb 22, 2019 · Average framerates at 1440p ultra are 62fps, basically tied with the GTX 1070, though of course the Asus 1660 Ti comes with a decent overclock. In RDR2 it would run at like 35-45 FPS on mid-low settings. My gtx 960 2gb was running 1440p at about 90fps, so your videocard should get up to 1440p/144hz/fps just fine. You can get a 27 inch monitor, 1440p. A place for everything NVIDIA, come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the industry, show-off your build and more. Right now Im using a 560 ti, very dated. At least one upcoming game (Jedi Survivor) requires a GPU with 8GB of VRAM so the 1660 ti might not be able to run that one at all, we'll have to see. 1660 ti for 1080p gaming 1660 super ($229) averages 93. EFT at 1440p 144Hz with GTX 1660 ti . there is the promise of DLSS working those Tensor Cores to actually make the card a Yikes the 6750 XT is good but not 4070 levels lol AMD has bad stock in my region but the prices are way better than nivida. I use my build for video editing and graphic design, as well as some gaming. 1440p is also the ultra wide resolution, that equals 4k. The 2070 also has more VRAM and we're now at a point where you really should be avoiding 6 GB cards whenever possible. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Benchmarks and performance test in 22 Games at 1440p in 2022Timestamps ⏱ Batman Arkham Knight : 00:00 God of War : 00:56 Godfall : 02: GPU: GTX 1660 Ti (Overclocked) RAM: 16 GB (2 x 8GB) DDR4 MoBo: AS Rock B450 Pro 4 PSU: Corsair CXM 450W 80+ Bronze Certified, Semi-modular ATX I'm also using a 1440p monitor with max 170hz, and I'm able to play all FPS and some older single player games at 120+ fps (where possible) at 1440p on max settings. 1 fps at 4k. If you want to play 1440p in high settings with no ray-tracing and using upscaling tech (DLSS or FSR) any of those 3 cards will do it. If you want a 4K monitor that does over 120hz it’s going to cost over $1000. Join our passionate community to stay informed and connected with the latest trends and technologies in the gaming laptop world. You also get frame generation which is fantastic for CPU-bound games. Had a 1660 Super, used it for 1440p gaming, did alright medium to high settings at 60-90fps depending on the title. Hi, I'm planning to get a 1440p monitor for gaming and I have a gtx 1660 super. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. According to techpowerup, the 6600 is about 25-30% faster than a 1660 Super. I had to buy a new monitor recently, and bought one with 1440p resolution. But I can't decide if I should get 4K 60Hz, 1440p 95Hz, or 1080p 144Hz. If he doesn't intend on ever buying either a 144hz or 1440p display the 1660 ti is too much. Would GTX 1660 (not TI) and i5 9400f 8gb Ram be sufficient for 1440p 144hz gaming on medium to high settings for most games? This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast No, not at all. As a 1440p gamer myself the one reason I encourage ppl to upgrade even if they are a bit underpowered GPU wise is games still look incredible with High/Ultra textures and Med settings for everything else. And how bad is it when playing with 50fps 1440p on medium-high settings compared to over 100fps 1080p on ultra settings ? All monitors: IPS, HDR. I played Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition, Control and Cyberpunk with RT and DLSS on. I've a 1660 ti that I originally planned to have upgraded by now. Understanding that currently finding a GPU is difficult, (this is more for future planning) what is the minimum GTX or equivalent GPU I should be looking for to support 60fps-165fps gaming at 1440p? Thanks! Apr 15, 2019 · The new GTX 1660 Ti graphics card tested in nine games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K resolutions by Digital Foundry. Whether the 1660 ti is a good choice for your friend, though, is really a matter of how much it costs. And Cyberpunk? Yeah, forget about 60. A RTX 2060/super would also be good for 1440p but again at high/mixed settings. , Death Stranding, you'll get less than 65 FPS, but a lot more than 36 FPS. 1660 super is fully able to utilize 1440p. It balances price and performance. 8 fps at 4k. Instead of forcing a resolution on your 4k monitor, use the "render scale" slider instead. i've a new 4070ti inno3d with a i5 13600kf. Depends on what you plan to do with it. 9GHz Allcore and a 1660 Ti OC be enough to handle it? Most showcases on YouTube only show the card at 1440p and max settings but that's not really what I want. Thereabout nowadays, yeah. Personal preference, of course, as I play games like CSGO which really benefit from the higher refresh rate. And the 1660 Ti is the best I can do (yes it is, I looked at 2 e-shops) And still, I can just upgrade to something like an RX 6750 XT later and buy a 1440p monitor along with it (and yes I already have/use the Ryzen 5 5600) What CPU and GPU combo do you think would be a great fit for 1440p gaming? Is it worth getting a whole new pc build or can I upgrde a parts? I appreciate any advice or insights you can share regarding potential bottlenecks, compatibility concerns, or other considerations I might be overlooking. However, current price of 3070 in India are pretty high. resident evil 4 remake crashed at 8gb vram textures option at 2k, so yeah, for VR at good resolution and games with huge big textures it's a problem even at 2k, 12gb + lower memory bandwidth are the only reason limiting 4070, otherwise would be good even for 4k. Gaming Valheim Genshin Impact Minecraft Pokimane Halo Infinite Call of Duty: Warzone Path of Exile Hollow Knight: Silksong Escape from Tarkov Watch Dogs: Legion Sports Depends on the games, but a 3060 Ti can handle 1440p pretty well. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. 25x the pixels of 1440p So, e. I've watched some videos but this combination is hard to come by and the one that exists was from more than a year ago The main reason is I want to get something bigger than 24" 1080p monitor so 1440p is the next logical step If you're looking for a good card for 1080p 144Hz or 1440p 60Hz, the 1660 Ti is perfect for that. The 3080ti is a big step up from my 3070 btw. Traditional 1440ps are 40% of 4K 21:9 1440p are 60% of 4K resolution This puts them right in the middle between between 1440p and 4K means you can run with your GPU stuff easily at 144Hz while at 4K that would only work for lower tier games. At $279, the 1660 ti is a great value and the most affordable entry into 1440p, 144Hz gaming. Here's one way to look at it: According to your tomshardware numbers, the 6600 performs about 35% better than the 1660 Super. Specs are an Intel i7-10750H, GTX 1660 Ti, 8gb RAM, 512gb SSD, 1920x1080 15. I was going for 1440p/Ultra, high-refresh rate gaming on a budget, so I just got a 4070 FE, upgrading from a 1660 Super. When gaming you can set it to 1080p for demanding games. Feb 22, 2019 · Let's get this out of the way now. I was curious if it'd be better to wait until I can get my hands on a card designed for 1440p or get a 2k monitor now and play games at 1080p until prices become sane again? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now Is 1660 TI enough for 1440p 144hz . I don't see a need for the 7900 XTX unless you're rich and just wanna go nuts. Cheapest 3070 I can find is 930 USD, whereas normally it should equal to or be somewhat less than 740 USD. A 1660 Super is indeed a competent card, it’s on the low end of the “midrange”. A GT1030, a notoriously “bad” GPU, can be “viable” if someone only does 2D gaming or light 3D gaming. However, the cards aren't in the same class. Samsung 970 pro is not worth anymore because samsung 970 evo plus is a bit cheaper and very fast also you have to spend 100$ more for the monitor i would recommend to go with asus 1440p 165hz monitor and g-sync perfect monitor for gaming you will better go with my build for more fps and you chose a very expensive motherboard with a cheap cpu and if you go with my build you will have better 1660ti is the lowest I'd go for 1440p. 1. 1080p 60 Hz Im Planning to Play Games at 1440p and 144 Hz and occasionally Stream, Prices on my country are: Jan 3, 2024 · Our pick for the best mid-range GPU for 144Hz 1440p gaming is the ASUS GeForce RTX 2070 Super overclocked. I have a 1660 super and it works fine for 1440p, but I don't see it working on 4k. The GTX 1660 ti is the fastest, and the GTX 1660 Super is just a little bit slower than the GTX 1660 ti. I won't be upgrading in the next 3-5 years as I will be keeping this gaming laptop for a long time. 5GHz had just no raw power to run it smooth (yes oc'd Also for the sake of future proofing as well, the 3070 is a better option for 1440p 144hz. 5 fps at 1080p, 72. Apr 15, 2019 · At £259/$279, the GTX 1660 Ti offers a healthy performance bump over the GTX 1060 that should make it a stand-out performer for 1080p gaming, but the last-generation GTX 1070 already fulfils a To answer the op's question, I think the 4070Ti is the better option for high-refresh rate 1440p gaming. kvfw kts vnkle hinus qbwg dbnkks nmugf foyxew xfzuhqth ibfjgp